Current:Home > ScamsJudge rules Ohio law that keeps cities from banning flavored tobacco is unconstitutional -InvestSmart Insights
Judge rules Ohio law that keeps cities from banning flavored tobacco is unconstitutional
View
Date:2025-04-28 00:43:12
An Ohio law prohibiting cities from banning the sale of flavored tobacco products is unconstitutional, a judge has ruled.
The state is expected to appeal the ruling issued Friday by Franklin County Common Pleas Court Judge Mark Serrott, who had issued a temporary restraining order in April that stopped the law from taking effect. The measure had become law in January, after the Republican Legislature overrode GOP Gov. Mike DeWine’s veto of a budget measure that put regulatory powers in the hands of the state.
The ruling stemmed from a suit brought by more than a dozen cities, including Columbus and Cincinnati, and Serrott’s decision means their bans will stay in effect. The ruling, though, applies only to those cities and is not a statewide injunction.
The measure, vetoed in 2022 before reappearing in the state budget, said regulating tobacco and alternative nicotine products should be up to the state, not municipalities. It also prevented communities from voting to restrict things like flavored e-cigarettes and sales of flavored vaping products.
Lawmakers passed the 2022 legislation days after Ohio’s capital city, Columbus, cleared its bans on the sale of flavored tobacco and menthol tobacco products, which would have been enacted early this year.
Anti-tobacco advocates, the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network and DeWine himself harshly criticized the override as a win for the tobacco industry, saying it enables addiction in children as tobacco and vaping products made with fruit or candy flavors becomes more popular and accessible to kids.
Opponents of the measure had argued in part that it violates Ohio’s home rule provision, which allows local governments to create their own ordinances as long as they do not interfere with the state’s revised code. Serrott agreed, finding that the law was only designed to prevent cities from exercising home rule.
At the time of the override vote, Senate President Matt Huffman said legislators had carefully reviewed the language with the Legislative Service Commission, a nonpartisan agency that drafts bills for the General Assembly, and didn’t believe it impacted all possible tobacco restrictions local governments could pass.
Proponents of the measure tout it as a way to maintain uniformity for tobacco laws and eliminate confusion for Ohioans. They argue the state should have control rather than communities because restrictions on the products would affect state income as a whole.
DeWine has maintained that the best way to ensure uniformity in these laws would be a statewide ban on flavored tobacco.
veryGood! (98)
Related
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- 8 mistakes to avoid if you're going out in the heat
- Pressing Safety Concerns, Opponents of the Mountain Valley Pipeline Gear Up for the Next Round of Battle
- Black-owned radio station may lose license over FCC 'character qualifications' policy
- Taylor Swift Eras Archive site launches on singer's 35th birthday. What is it?
- Activists Are Suing Texas Over Its Plan to Expand Interstate 35, Saying the Project Is Bad for Environmental Justice and the Climate
- What the Supreme Court's rejection of student loan relief means for borrowers
- U.S. is barred from combating disinformation on social media. Here's what it means
- Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
- Barbie's Simu Liu Reveals What the Kens Did While the Barbies Had Their Epic Sleepover
Ranking
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- REI fostered a progressive reputation. Then its workers began to unionize
- Geraldo Rivera, Fox and Me
- Vibrating haptic suits give deaf people a new way to feel live music
- Travis Hunter, the 2
- The Supreme Court rules against USPS in Sunday work case
- The black market endangered this frog. Can the free market save it?
- Twitter vs. Threads, and why influencers could be the ultimate winners
Recommendation
Most popular books of the week: See what topped USA TODAY's bestselling books list
'Barbie' beats 'Oppenheimer' at the box office with a record $155 million debut
Why building public transit in the US costs so much
Is Threads really a 'Twitter killer'? Here's what we know so far
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
The best games of 2023 so far, picked by the NPR staff
Q&A: Robert Bullard Led a ‘Huge’ Delegation from Texas to COP27 Climate Talks in Egypt
Reneé Rapp Leaving The Sex Lives Of College Girls Amid Season 3
Like
- Juan Soto praise of Mets' future a tough sight for Yankees, but World Series goal remains
- The US Forest Service Planned to Increase Burning to Prevent Wildfires. Will a Pause on Prescribed Fire Instead Bring More Delays?
- Tribes object. But a federal ruling approves construction of the largest lithium mine